Terraforming Mars vs Ark Nova: Which Should You Buy?
If you are shopping for one big, card-soaked engine-builder to anchor your shelf, these are the two titans you keep circling. Both pack hundreds of cards, both reward building a satisfying economic machine over a long evening, and both sit near the top of the heavy-game heap. People who love one almost always find themselves weighing the other, since they scratch a very similar itch.
They diverge on theme, polish, and how much new ground each keeps showing you. Terraforming Mars puts you in charge of a corporation making a red rock livable, playing cards to raise the temperature, flood in oceans, and seed oxygen. Ark Nova has you building a modern, conservation-minded zoo from a deck of more than two hundred cards. Both are deep, both are long, and both ask for patience, but the experience of sitting down with each one is distinct.
/pic3536616.jpg)
/pic3536616.jpg)
Terraforming Mars
2016 · Jacob Fryxelius
One of the great engine-builders, and it earns its reputation, as long as you can forgive the cheap components and a couple of slow turns. If a deep card-driven economy sounds like a good evening, this is a keeper.
Affiliate link — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
/pic6293412.jpg)
/pic6293412.jpg)
Ark Nova
2021 · Mathias Wigge
A huge, brilliant, card-soaked puzzle that asks for your whole evening and most of your brain.
Affiliate link — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Terraforming Mars
- Over 200 project cards and 12 corporations, so the variety is genuinely huge
- The engine-building is some of the most satisfying in the hobby
- Theme and mechanics line up: every action feels like it's actually changing Mars
- Component quality is rough for the price, those plastic cubes slide everywhere
- Downtime and analysis paralysis can drag, and the leader can run away with it
Ark Nova
- Endless replayability, since you see only about half the cards in any game
- Lots of different routes to a winning zoo
- Thematically rich in a way heavy euros usually aren't
- The rules overhead is real, and teaching it has been called a chore
- The pace can sag at higher player counts
Terraforming Mars and Ark Nova both sit in our Drafting list. See the full Drafting ranking to find where each one lands and what else is worth a spot on your shelf.
How they actually play
Terraforming Mars is the purest engine-builder of the pair. You are a corporation playing cards, over two hundred of them, each one bolting another part onto your economy as you push Mars toward habitable. The thing players rave about is that engine: reviewers who put twenty games in say no two felt the same, and theme and mechanics line up so every action feels like it is actually changing the planet. The flip side is downtime, since a heavy card hand invites analysis paralysis, and an early lead tends to snowball.
Ark Nova puts you in charge of building a modern, conservation-minded zoo, drafting animals, sponsors, and projects from a deck of more than two hundred cards. There are many different routes to a winning zoo, and it is thematically rich in a way heavy euros usually are not. You are juggling several interlocking systems at once, and players three years deep still call it their favorite because there is so much packed into the box that it keeps showing you new things. The pace can sag at higher player counts while everyone thinks.
Complexity and learning curve
Both are serious commitments, but on paper Terraforming Mars rates as the heavier of the two, sitting at Heavy versus Ark Nova's Medium-Heavy. In practice the teach is brutal on both: Ark Nova's rules overhead is real, and more than one reviewer has flatly called teaching it a chore, while Terraforming Mars demands that players actually want a heavy euro and will happily spend two hours feeding a machine they built from scratch.
Neither is a game you spring on a casual table. The player who bounces off Terraforming Mars wants something light and quick, and is put off by the sliding-cube components and the slow turns. The player who bounces off Ark Nova underestimated the long first teach. Both punish impatience and reward folks who like the deep end, so the choice here is less about which is easier and more about which theme and structure you find more inviting.
Replayability and table presence
Replayability is a strength for both, drawn from those enormous card pools. Terraforming Mars has over two hundred project cards and twelve corporations, so the variety is genuinely huge, and the engine-building is some of the most satisfying in the hobby. Ark Nova goes a step further on freshness: you see only about half its cards in any game, so it keeps reinventing itself for years.
On polish, Ark Nova has the clear edge. Terraforming Mars is loved despite its production, since the component quality is rough for the price and those plastic cubes slide all over a bumped table, so many players grab a playmat or baggies to tame them. Ark Nova feels like the more modern, thematically immersive package on the table. Both sag at their higher player counts, with three or four being the sweet spot for each.
Buy Terraforming Mars if you want the classic, deeply satisfying card-driven economic engine and you can forgive cheap components and a couple of slow turns. Buy Ark Nova if you want the more modern, thematically rich heavyweight with better polish and a card pool deep enough to surprise you for years. Both demand a patient table and a long evening, so neither suits casual players. If production quality and theme matter most, lean Ark Nova; if pure engine-building is the dream, Terraforming Mars still earns its reputation.
Terraforming Mars is the great card-engine despite its components; Ark Nova is the slicker, deeper modern heavyweight.